Category Archives: California

The Generational Curse of Marijuana

Family Disease of Addiction Unleashed by State Legalization

When a state legalizes drugs, it changes the culture dramatically and does incredible damage to the family system. Take the case of Ralph who believes he lost three nephews because of marijuana, and has completely lost touch with his sister, perhaps because of marijuana abuse by both her husband and daughter.

Ralph is 75 years old and moved out of the state of California once medical marijuana became legal. He witnessed crime skyrocketing, and pervasive drug use that he didn’t want his wife and children exposed to. “I didn’t want to live in a prison with bars on my windows.” He describes whole houses being robbed when people were away.  He saw motorcycle gang members doing drug pickups in his residential neighborhood and noticed people became afraid to walk outdoors in the once safe community.

The Curse of Marijuana on the Family System

The stories he tells of his nephews are chilling. His first brother Steven’s 15 year old son Tom was murdered, along with his 15 year old cousin Sarah in cold blood by a Mexican-American Vietnam Veteran. The two children were out bicycle riding in an orchard. The stranger killed them and stole their bicycles. He was a psychotic killer and later found to be responsible for the murders of at least 5 children. News reports describe him as a brutal rapist who had anger issues. Ralph is convinced he was a marijuana user which caused his mental health problems.

Steven’s other son, Samuel, started smoking marijuana in grade school and kept it up all through his teen years. His habit caught up with him when he lost a job as a welder after failing a drug test. Unemployed, he lost his home and his boat. Samuel drank himself to death in his early 40’s.

Employers won’t hire a marijuana user, because insurance companies won’t cover them – the risk is too great of an on the job accident. One of Ralph’s sons works for a large company in California as a manager and has a hard time finding prospective employees because few can pass the drug test.

His other brother, Craig had a son, Frank, who was 20 years old when his wife got him involved in marijuana. He began doing crimes, Ralph thinks, because of the influence of the drug. Frank involved his children in his crimes, hoisting his children through the windows of homes so they could open the door and he could break in to steal to support his drug habit. He even robbed a bank. He was put in prison and became a hardened criminal. Every time he was released from prison, he would do a crime because he wanted to go back. Frank called prison, “the only home I got.” Finally, he was sentenced to life in prison with no possibility of parole. He died there at age 42.

Tragically, Frank’s son was also into drugs, starting with marijuana and ended up doing both cocaine and heroin. Ralph says his relatives told him the drugs “fried his brain.” Tired of living the way he was living, Frank’s son died ‘playing chicken’ with a diesel truck. He hit the truck head on going 60 miles per hour. Ralph believes he intended to commit suicide and that he was probably under the influence of the drug at the time.

As to Ralph’s sister, she married a heavy pot smoker. Their daughter is a heavy marijuana user. His sister has moved out of California and refuses to talk to her family. “She is just not herself anymore,” explains Ralph.

Thankfully, Ralph’s children were spared the fate of their cousins, perhaps because Ralph moved out of California to protect them from the drug culture.  Sadly, both of his brothers lost their only children to early death. Ralph lays the blame on the permissive drug culture in California.

Note:  The names of the persons in this story were changed to protect their identities.

California State Legislature Ignores Brain Health

Governor Now Has Opportunity to Speak up for Youth Brain Health

A group of six parents who spoke at a Moms Strong rally in Sacramento highlighted the egregious ways marijuana harms young brains. Their exposés shed light on how costly it has been to freely give out medical marijuana to 18-year-olds whose brains are still under development. The state legislature had a chance but failed to raise the age for smoking and ingesting medical marijuana to 21. Gov. Jerry Brown now has the opportunity to speak out once again against marijuana legalization, citing a need for taking brain health seriously.

Smoking cigarettes takes off from the end of life while using marijuana increases the risk of mental impairment in early life and increases the risk for suicide by 7x.  A poster at the rally showed photos of seven people who died from suicide following psychotic breaks after ingesting or smoking marijuana.

NAMI and Science Provide the Facts

National Alliance for Mental Illness (NAMI) states that marijuana is the substance of abuse recognized for a relationship to schizophrenia.  NAMI’s webpage for schizophrenia states:  “A growing body of evidence indicates that smoking marijuana increases the risk of psychotic incidents and the risk of ongoing psychotic experiences. The younger and more frequent the use, the greater the risk. Another study has found that smoking marijuana led to earlier onset of schizophrenia and often preceded the manifestation of the illness.”

Dr. Christine Miller, a neurologist who has studied schizophrenia for 25 years,  spoke several times at the rally.  She maintains that there is no amount of marijuana that can be safely used and no way to detect who will be harmed.   Her handout from the rally cites numerous longitudinal studies from around the world.

State Legislature Sends Wrong Signals

In California, anyone aged 18 or over can find a doctor to give a recommendation for medical marijuana without reason. Given the strength of today’s marijuana, numerous  young people have gone into psychosis and have needed extensive mental health treatment, as well as addiction treatment.  A hospital in Washington state has one to two new psychosis patients every day, as a result of dabbing and the younger age of marijuana usage.

California does not track medical marijuana users for psychosis, schizophrenia, depression, suicide or other negative mental health outcomes.  In fact, the United States and individual states do not have tracking systems for psychosis and schizophrenia.

Canada and the American Society of Addiction Medicine insist that the age limit for “medical” marijuana should be 25 or over, after the brain has fully developed.  The State legislature should consider health in early adulthood–when one is completing their education and getting that very first job — as important as end-of-life issues.

Tobacco Cigarettes Versus Marijuana Smoke or Edibles

When California raised the age for buying cigarettes to age 21, Citizens Against the Legalization of Marijuana (CALM) vigorously lobbied the state legislature and the governor to include “medical” marijuana (excluding CBD for seizures or for terminal cancer).  It would have been logical to include another smoked product.

When the state banned vape pens and e-cigarettes for those under 21, it excluded medical marijuana.  “If California gets a national reputation as being a little bit kooky, sometimes we have only ourselves to blame,”  read an article in LA Weekly explaining the new law.  It means there is no limit on teenagers vaping marijuana, including concentrated pot products like hash oil, wax and dabs.

Our lungs develop until age 18.  When the age limit for buying tobacco products was set at 18, medical research had shown that lung damage could be mitigated by waiting until the lungs had fully developed before starting to smoke.

Our brains continue to develop until age 25, perhaps until age 28 or 29 for males.  Therefore, a person who begins smoking or ingesting marijuana after age 25 experiences less brain damage and fewer negative consequences than those who begin below age 25.  (While tobacco smoke has its greater influence on the health of our lungs, the THC of marijuana has the more influence on our brains than any other organ.)

Tom Steyer is Silent

tom-steyer
Tom Steyer

Billionaire political donor Tom Steyer is currently running a TV advertisement in favor of raising the tax on cigarettes by $2, but remains silent about the environmental damage of marijuana and Proposition 64.    Considering that he is an environmental activist and cares about lungs, his silence is on Proposition 64 is perplexing.  It is completely fine to be against BIG TOBACCO, but it is not progressive enough to be against BIG MARIJUANA.   The Dark Money behind Proposition 64 comes from George Soros, and from Silicon Valley billionaires.  People give BIG MARIJUANA a pass because this greedy industry is promoting itself as quite glamorous.

Here’s news for Mr. Steyer and others: Big tobacco is investing in marijuana.   However, Joe Camel is no longer cool or popular but marijuana is hyped as the next big investment.

When California allows doctors to recommend medical marijuana, there are no specifications for dosages. There’s no record-keeping.  It can be given over the phone without even seeing the doctor, with a minimal fee.

CALM and Moms Strong, a coalition of drug prevention activists and those who have lost family members to marijuana abuse, demonstrated in front of the capitol on October 4, 2016.  In a rousing series  of speeches which ended when legislature member Jim Cooper arrived at 1:30, the activists told how their lives had been influenced and changed by marijuana.  Jim Cooper is the Assistant Majority Leader in the state legislature and his district includes Sacramento.  Maybe he can spread his knowledge to other legislature members.

(Editor’s Note: The parents’ speeches were the core of the rally, but other talks were given by Bishop Ron Allen and other members of CALM, as well as prevention activists and visitors from Colorado)

Calaveras County Enters Illicit Drug Trade for Economic Salvation

Some people say California has already legalized marijuana and Proposition 64 gives it a chance to be regulated. Pandora’s box has been opened.  We can and will put it back, by following federal law and adhering to international treaties.

California never learned how to regulate medical marijuana, so it will not learn anything new 20 years later.   Calaveras County serves as a great example.  Now a group is working to ban commercial grows Calaveras County this fall.  Please support them. Here’s why:

Abuse of Humans and the Environment

On September 14, two women were arrested for holding four men captive to work on a marijuana plantation near West Point in Calaveras County.   The men had escaped violence in Mexico, only to be forced at gun point to work on a marijuana plantation. When discovered in late July, a chain of events began and several law enforcement agencies eradicated 23,245 marijuana plants on private and public lands.  The Federal Bureau of Land Management led the way.

Calaveras County had a devastating fire that burned 71,000 acres and destroyed 860 houses and other buildings.  In seeking economic salvation, the County commissioners voted 4 to 1 to sell licenses for cultivating “medical marijuana”.  They ultimately sold 200 permits for an annual fee of $5,000, bringing in $1 million in revenues.  By imposing a $2 per square foot annual levy on outdoor commercial grows, and $5 per square foot on indoor grows, the County hopes to bring in $4 million in new tax revenue.

marijuanacampers
A camper left behind by marijuana growers in Calaveras County.  Read more.

The licenses allow up to 99 plants.  If you do the math, at 1 to 5 lbs per plant in outdoor cultivation, that equates to 118,000 to almost 600,000 joints.  Some indoor grows in Oregon are getting in excess of 10 lbs per plant, with plants the size of orange trees. All of this is being grown under the guise of medicine in a  “medical marijuana” market that has long since been saturated.

Should Prop 64 pass, and every resident allowed to grow 6 plants, and enforcement will be simply impossible.  Just read the testimonies of those who are suffering from the crime and selfishness of marijuana growers. Let’s Save Calaveras County.

Crime and More Crime

A year ago, a 72-year-old woman was arrested for shooting and killing her son because “he was going to rape her.”  They lived together on a marijuana farm in West Point, Calaveras County.  Also in 2015, three people were shot and killed trying to steal marijuana from a local pot farm. Ironically, the Sheriff and California Highway Patrol are ramping up to provide better protection for the growers during harvest season, including extensive use of a helicopter.  In contrast, it is almost impossible to get anyone to enforce state or federal laws to protect the public from the drug.

Human trafficking is all over California’s marijuana trade.  In San Francisco, Asian gangs bring in young, underage laborers living in crowded grow houses surrounded by the stench.

In Lake County, two marijuana growers used a 15-year old girl for labor and sex, chaining her ankle to a box to keep her from escaping.  The men are expected to plead guilty for “illegally growing marijuana and using a minor in a drug operation,” while the sexual and human trafficking charges are dismissed.  Are these the people the ACLU claims are non-violent drug offenders while trying to get them out of jail?

Cosmopolitan Magazine and Reveal recently published exposés of the secretive sexual exploitation that is woven into very profitable marijuana industry of the Emerald Triangle (Humboldt, Trinity and Mendocino Counties).

Economic Salvation is Really the Downfall

Calaveras isn’t unique in turning to pot to solve their economic problems.  Examples include Desert Hot Springs who is planning on 3 million square feet of indoor cultivation; Adelanto, a desert town in Southern California with no other obvious forms of salvation; and Coalinga, a little town in the San Joaquin valley converting a prison to a pot farm. All these towns are oblivious the harmful impacts of marijuana on humans, or the fact that social costs will exceed income by 10 times, or that they have violated federal law and their most fundamental responsibility, to protect the people.marijuanaisthedevil

In populated areas throughout the state, the stench (i.e. skunk-like smell) is causing serious air pollution problems. It triggers asthma in children or make conditions worse.  People can’t open their windows at night, and if they complain their lives are threatened. The pesticides used threaten the health of anyone within 1 to 1.5 miles, and have been linked to serious illnesses, including harms to babies in utero. The net result is the quality of life is adversely affected, real estate values are diminished and it is all to produce a problem with known harms to the brains of our youth.

Drug legalizers say the War on Drugs has failed, and that legalization is the answer.  For sure, greed and money in politics gets in the way. It’s a war that can never be won entirely, but surrender isn’t an option.  From 1978 to 1992, marijuana and other drug use by youth was cut in half.  Because of today’s greed and the influence of money on our politicians, marijuana use has gone from 7 to 13% over the past 8 years, and 129 Americans dying of drug overdose every day.

Marijuana and other drugs inflict more death, social destruction and economic cost on this nation than all events in modern history.  If we care about our youth, public health, safety and our natural resources, it is time to demand of our leaders at all levels that they focus once again on serving the people and fulfilling their oath of office.  That includes Calaveras County.   Vote No on Prop 64.
_______________________________________________________

ABOUT THE AUTHOR ….

ROGER MORGAN Chairman/Founder, Take Back America Campaign, 

20 year anti-drug activist dealing with drug prevention at the local, state and national level.  (www.tbac.us)Formerly Chairman and Executive Director of the Coalition for A Drug-Free California. Owner/CEO of Steelheart International LLC, engaged in international business development and has been an entrepreneur and businessman in California for 35 years.  He was Founding Chairman of the Coronado SAFE Foundation in 1997, a non-profit dealing with drug prevention; prior Board Member of the San Diego Prevention Coalition; member of the National Coalition for Student Drug Testing; and Special Advisor to the Golden Rule Society in Coronado.

Soros Buys Influence Over Marijuana Policy and Nearly Everything

Two years ago, Forbes Magazine claimed that billionaire George Soros had already given $200 million to the cause of marijuana legalization.

After releasing some 2500 damaging emails about George Soros and his policy arm, Open Society Foundation, the Twitter account of WikiLeaks was removed.  How can one man have so much power?  Is a person who plays chess with the world’s financial markets and social media also a puppeteer who can control the lives of people and political events from above?

In 1992, Soros brought down the British pound and nearly broke the Bank of England, making at least $1 billion on his financial position. During the Asian financial crisis in 1997,  it was thought that Soros’  market manipulation contributed to the crisis, crippling the economies of  Thailand and Malaysia.   One Thai activist described him as “a kind of Dracula. He sucks the blood from the people.”    In 2011, his conviction for insider trading in France which he took part in back in 1988, was upheld up by the European High Court.

Soros manipulated the world’s financial markets before trying his hand at control of internal US policy.  His first domestic policy interest was to change how we treat illegal drugs.  The push to legalize marijuana begun 25-30 years ago, and passing of California’s medical marijuana in 1996 was his first big success.   In 2016, the Sacramento Bee reports that a “small number of individuals, corporations and dark money organizations that don’t disclose their donors have paid for the initiative with more than $16 million in donations of $250,000 or more.”1   Soros is chief financier behind Drug Policy Alliance and other changes in US drug policy.

Deception at the Heart of the Legalization Movement

The marijuana lobbying depends on the propagation of myths, such as the idea that marijuana is only illegal because of racism against blacks and Mexicans.  Never mind that Mexico made marijuana completely illegal in 1920, and that the United States is bound by several treaties to keep marijuana illegal. Drug Policy Alliance supports the legalization of all drugs.

At this writing the funding for Proposition is over $16 million, with Sean Parker giving $4 million more than previously stated.
At this writing the funding for Proposition is over $16 million, with Sean Parker giving $4 million more than previously stated.

To get full legalization, the first step was to use medical marijuana as a way in the door, pretending is that medical marijuana is about compassion.   (There are videos in which NORML’s leaders admit it’s  a gimmick to get full legalization.  Putting it to vote allows the maximum deception, because ballots are vague and provide a good way of getting around regulation.)

“Regulate like alcohol” and “eliminate the black market” are some of the rallying cries for legalizing pot.  Regulating alcohol doesn’t prevent underage drinking or keep drunk drivers off the road.  Why would marijuana be different?

Another big myth the drug lobby fosters is that people get arrest records and go to jail for a one-time mistake. The truth is that they commit other crimes while on drugs and get convicted for “drug possession only” by using plea bargains.   Drug Courts and judges have been using the drug treatment option for nearly 20 years, a fact that legalizers omit.

The current message is one of inevitability, despite big losses in states like Vermont and Ohio.  However, by saying “inevitable,” the marijuana industry and its financiers can intimidate anyone who might disagree and donate to the other side.   It’s David vs. Goliath in terms of money…………….and bullying.

Soros Web of Control through Policy and Funding

As WikiLeaks revealed, Soros influenced Secretary Clinton’s push for the 2011 Panama Free Trade Agreement, which opened up that country as as a tax haven for billionaires, a direct benefit to him.

A book funded by the Soros’ Open Policy Institute, Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow, omits critical information about drug courts which give drug addiction treatment as an alternative to jail.  The book also doesn’t discuss the plea bargains which allow drug users to serve their sentences for drug crimes in lieu of more serious crimes.  The author strategically kept out information which did not help the bias from which the book was written.  Like her patron, Michelle Alexander supports the legalization of all drugs.   Maia Szalavitz is another pro-legalization writer who is a Soros Fellow.

We are told that George Soros funded the education of ACLU lawyer Alison Holcomb.  She wrote Initiative-502 to legalize marijuana in Washington state and met with Gavin Newsom and Sean Parker to discuss Proposition 64.  (More on I-502 in part 2)

There’s a group of people who have been supported by Soros and are beholden to him, including Vanita Gupta, currently head of the Civil Rights Division in the Justice Department.  Despite her intelligence and success as a prosecutor, Gupta doesn’t appear to understand crime and addiction as it relates to drugs.  She also supports the legalization of all drugs,  She was a recipient of a Soros Fund Fellowship and was supported by the Soros’ Open Society Institute.   Perhaps agreement on this issue is a litmus test for getting grants from groups that Soros funds, and getting powerful appointments in government.

Soros gives a great deal of money to the ACLU which has tons of money and funds studies to point out that blacks are arrested for drugs proportionately more frequently than whites.    As for Washington, DC, Police Chief Cathy Lanier wrote that the “ACLU misconstrues the District’s data” and “appears not to understand our city well.”   Lanier also suggests that police do not target, but have use their responsibility to respond to neighborhood requests.

The ACLU operates by telling people how they’re supposed to be thinking.  For minorities, the ACLU’s attitude is patronizing.  Giving minorities permission to destroy their brain with drugs is not social justice and civil rights.  Furthermore, pretending racism can be solved by marijuana legalization is simplistic thinking at best.  Plus it destroys the rights of minorities who choose not to use drugs. The ACLU considers the rights drug users and drug dealers ahead of the rights of others to live in peace.

A similar simplistic approach of Soros/DPA and related groups is to charge that the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) created cartels and drug violence in Mexico.  Of course there are always many reasons for any social problem, which in this case includes drug demand and poverty.

Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM) has a middle ground with drug policy with more creative problem-solving ideas.  There are solutions to the problems of criminal justice which address the dangers of drug use and drug crime, but don’t involve legalization.

As President Obama’s first Director of the ONDCP said,  “It’s time for the United States to “acknowledge and come to grips with the link between crime and substance use” and ease the burden on its criminal justice system.   (He no longer has the job; is that Soros’ influence?)  The way to bring down incarceration is to bring down drug usage, since the vast majority of crimes are committed by people on drugs.  The United States has less than 5% of the world’s population but nearly 60% of the world’s drug users.  Yet people wonder why the rate of incarceration is high.

Soros’s Influence on Other Groups

Other billionaires and political donors concentrate on a few issues they know well, such as Tom Steyer’s support of environmental causes.  (As a Californian, he  should learn about marijuana, how it destroys the environment and leaves the problems of smell and secondhand smoke.)

It’s hypocritical when politicians who complain about Citizens’ United and the Koch Brothers don’t mention George Soros.   What’s even more ironic is that Soros is far more powerful than the Koch Brothers. He is the most influential of all political donors because of how he spreads donations into the many 527 groups he funds.

Small donors who opposed the Iraq War in 2002 – 2003 contributed to MoveOn.org because of a specific issue, but the organization morphed into something entirely different. After George Soros made a large donation to the group, the organization decided it could control the Democratic Party.  In an email signed by MoveOn’s leaders in 2004, they claimed control of the Democratic Party, “Now it’s our Party: we bought it, we own it, and we’re going to take it back.”   (There’s evidence that Soros hasn’t donated to MoveOn since 2004.  After changing its emphasis, he let go.)

The American Friends Service Committee is another group whose goals were substantially changed following Soros donations which moved the Quaker group into new territory far away from its historical purpose of fostering peace.

Soros Control of Political Reports and The Media

Again, how did Soros get his information removed from WikiLeaks?

We cannot expect non-biased reports from Open Secrets, which has taken $100,000 from Soros’ Open Society Foundation  this year.   Its reports about donations for and against marijuana legalization are wildly skewed in favor of legalization.  How ironic that it published an article in 2014 stating that “money not morals drives marijuana prohibition movement.” 2  (It would have been more honest to say money not morals drives marijuana legalization.)

Soros  funds of The Nation Magazine, Center for American Progress and other groups. There is now a echo chamber in the media which supports marijuana legalization.  Soros’s influence goes much further than just donating outside money to drug legalization efforts. When The Nation and MSNBC reported that “anti-marijuana legalization groups” CADCA and Partnership for a Drug Free America are tools of the pharmaceutical companies, they did not report how minuscule the donations were compared to total funding for those organizations.  Dr. Carl Hart,  the spokesperson MSNBC  who was asked to comment on donations to CADCA and Partnership for Drug Free America, criticized the donations without stating that he is on the board of the Drug Policy Alliance funded by Soros.

Arianna Huffington is on the Honorary Board of the Drug Policy Alliance, too.  The Huffington Post’s marijuana articles are heavily biased in favor of marijuana legalization and rarely report about the negative side of marijuana.

Advocates of marijuana legalization claim with little evidence that pharmaceutical companies are trying to stop marijuana legalization.  Pharmaceutical companies — like marijuana companies — give lots of money to politicians, there’s slim evidence  pharma is connected to opposition to marijuana legalization.” 3

Claims that George Soros’ interest in marijuana is control of GMO marijuana and hemp may be farfetched.  However, he was a huge investor in Monsanto and had some power over legalization in Uruguay.   Read about Soros’ biggest failure in Part 2.

_____________________________________________________________________

  1.  This year Sean Parker of Napster and Facebook fame is the top funder for California’s marijuana legalization ballot.  Soros is still involved and so are the descendants of his friend Peter Lewis who give through New Approach.
  2. The article listed police unions, prison guard unions, the alcohol industry, pharmaceuticals and for-profit prison companies as the chief funders against legalization.  The first two groups don’t have much money to give; alcohol is mixed and donates in small amounts, and the last two were a good guesses.  A quote used by a popular meme about cannabis legalization and for profit prisons is accurate, but its context is not.  Snopes reported that the$17.4 million spent by Corrections Corporations of America in lobbying had nothing to do with marijuana legalization.
  3. A quote comes from According to Brookings Institution (which supports and funds marijuana legalization), “pharmaceutical companies have kept an arm’s-length distance from marijuana ballot initiatives.”  Read Bootleggers, Baptists, bureaucrats and bongs: how special interests will shape marijuana legalization in Arizona.  Since that report, a company in Arizona has given $500,000 against legalization in Arizona, a small amount compared to Soros’ web of funding.